Open research / Code, models & evidence
Software that connects questions to evidence. Our contribution is an ecosystem: inference methods, physical models, reusable results, and the infrastructure that makes the work inspectable.
The group develops and contributes to collaborative scientific software. Some projects are inference engines; others connect tools, release data, teach methods, or test how agents can produce verifiable research. Each has a different role.
Start with your task Infer the source From gravitational-wave strain to constraints on compact binaries.
Collaborative inference toolkit
Estimate source parameters with an iterative likelihood-based inference framework.
Contribution RIT and collaborators develop the inference methods and software; the official project is the starting point for current code. Connection Connects physical signal models to likelihood evaluations and posterior samples. Research software
Official source ↗ Development lineage ↗
Collaborator extension
Extend RIFT inference to massive black-hole signals for LISA.
Contribution Aasim Jan and collaborators adapt the RIFT framework to a different observing regime. Connection Builds on RIFT; demonstrates reuse of inference machinery across instruments. Research extension
Source ↗ Associated paper ↗
Model the physics. Reuse the evidence. Surrogates make expensive models usable; public samples make published analyses inspectable.
Physical-model surrogate
Interpolate simulated kilonova emission for rapid modeling and inference.
Contribution Marko Ristic contributes surrogate models and notebooks using simulations credited to Ryan Wollaeger and Oleg Korobkin. Connection Brings electromagnetic counterpart models into the multimessenger inference ecosystem. Research models & notebooks
Source ↗ Associated paper ↗
Reusable scientific outputs
Inspect posterior samples and marginalized-likelihood tables from published analyses.
Contribution The group releases inference products with event-specific context and citations. Connection Provides downstream inputs for comparison, plotting, and population studies; cite each originating analysis. Public data release
Data & citations ↗
Collaborative data release
Explore the inference products accompanying a study of GW200105 eccentricity.
Contribution A joint UT Austin/RIT release maintained by Aasim Jan; credit belongs to the listed research collaboration. Connection Links a specific scientific claim to reusable analysis products. Paper-associated data
Data & paper ↗
Connect the workflow Turn individual programs into a research process people can run, inspect, and maintain.
Integration contribution
Connect RIFT outputs to per-analysis and combined PESummary pages through ASIMOV.
Contribution Our contribution is the adapter and its versioned RIFT asset interface. ASIMOV and PESummary are independently maintained upstream projects. Connection Separates reporting integration from the inference engine so each can evolve. Integration package
Source & examples ↗
Training contribution
Learn inference workflows through worked RIFT examples.
Contribution The group shares teaching and onboarding material alongside the scientific code. Connection Use these examples for orientation, and check the official RIFT project for current installation guidance. Historical worked examples
Tutorials ↗
Source-linked research practice
Carry practical lessons between projects, contributors, and agent sessions.
Contribution RIFT integrator lore records sampler behavior and tradeoffs; SuperNu lore records operational recipes for the independently developed LANL transport code. Connection These are knowledge contributions, with source references and uncertainty labels, rather than new inference or transport engines. Working documentation
RIFT integrator lore ↗ SuperNu lore ↗
Make distributed work checkable Experimental infrastructure for coordinating evaluations, preserving evidence, and reviewing claims.
Adaptive-workflow experiment
Explore adaptive inference and persistent evaluation caches on a synthetic population problem.
Contribution A runnable demonstration of coordination and reuse across model evaluations. Connection Tests workflow ideas that may support larger inference campaigns; it is not a validated astrophysical model. Synthetic demonstration
Source & demonstration ↗
Shared interface experiment
Define evaluation records and replay-safe campaign assimilation.
Contribution Experimental schemas, synthetic fixtures, and a reference reducer provide a small, inspectable coordination boundary. Connection A proposed connection between evaluators and campaign managers; science adapters and production adoption are not established. Experimental · no stable API
Schemas & reducer ↗
Publication & verification prototype
Explore how agents offer evidence, check claims, rely on scoped findings, and amend errors.
Contribution A public research dossier and agent-first prototype make the publication process itself available for inspection. Connection Supports the objective of autonomous publication with independent verification. Runnable exercises are distinct from an adopted or empirically validated protocol. Research dossier & prototype
Research & prototype ↗
Credit, reuse, and contribution Follow each project's source for its license, citation instructions, maintainers, and contribution process. A development fork is not evidence of upstream authorship. A public prototype is not evidence of adoption or validated science. These descriptions distinguish group contributions, collaborative work, and independently maintained upstream tools.
AI agents help write code, organize evidence, and maintain documentation in parts of this ecosystem. Consult each project's provenance and review records; AI participation and publication do not establish independent validation. Our authorship and verification policy explains the distinction.
Curated from public project documentation on 25 September 2026. Explore the science questions and the agent and trust objectives behind this work.